version control - UCM Clear Case: Hiereachy of streams in one project vs multiple projects -

-

We have a project and otherwise adding a new piece of functionality to a stable codebase, without fixing a big change. This scheme is making intermediate construction and testing of new facility for different time (maybe one month) and the facility is ending and merged the code of new facility in the main branch in the quality admissible.

The question below is better in case of a clear case of two scenarios:

  1. A new project based on the baseline in the existing project integration stream With the intermediate distribution for the integration of the developing new project, the construction of this new project in a separate project and the integration from the stream created. And ultimately delivers changes to the new project integration stream for the main project (aka or dev).

  2. Using the hierarchy of streams in the main project: Child stream of integration stream (it is called template_in) in main project and a child stream of temp_iit (it is called temp_adv ). Develops a new feature in Temp_dev, from temp_int and temp_int with periodic distribution, and then provides new functionality from temp_int to the main integration stream.

The question is whether you need to create or create a new project Sub-section is a classical one.

In my opinion, both options are quite similar.

The only important difference is the base baseline, which you will be able to choose during the new creation, for this special development effort, Section:

  • For sub-section, you Only will be able to select the base line produced on the original stream.
  • A new project for the mainstream, you will be able to choose any of the baseline as you wish.

In addition to:

  • A new project provides a new location to isolate several streams in a consistent container but if you have new feature development If there is a need to include some small development of the static code made, the quote will be in order.
  • After the development is over, a sub-stream end allows the client to visualize clearly: Distributed original stream will be a natural operation for the merger. In addition, it is possible to keep it up to date in your development stream from the periodic rebase original stream.

So if you have only one stream with clear delivery, the sub-stream option is sufficient.
If you are getting more complex than ever before, then a good project is good.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

asp.net - Javascript/DOM Why is does my form not support submit()? -

-
This is my first time working with asp.net and javascript, so I do not know very good web resources, or Much about javascript debugging I have to find out that on line oFormObject.submit (); Microsoft JScript Runtime Error: Object does not support this property or method I am using the link to work as a button because I am terrible in aesthetics and I think That link will look more professional than a table of 50 buttons. I have read that this solution can cause problems with browsers due to pre-rendering of my links and many additional traffic and problems, but CSS gives me a button like a link, which has issues of alignment and difference seemed to. & lt ;! DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "- // W3C // DTD HTML 4.01 // N" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd"> & Lt; Html xmlns = "http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" & gt; & Lt; Head & gt; & Lt; Link rel = "stylesheet" type = "text / css" href = "defect differen
Read more

sockets - Delphi: TTcpServer, connection reset when reading -

-
I am trying to implement one for Delphi, but there are some problems with communication. Fitnesse will start my process, and give me a portmember as a command line argument. Then I should make a socket on the port number given to me, and fitness will connect to that port I am using a TCPCP server for the job: < Pre> TcpServer1.LocalPort: = ParamStr (ParamCount); TcpServer1 Active: = true; On OnEXEPT () -Event, I send the protocol version to use as specified in the protocol. Process TForm1.TcpServer1Accept (From: TOBject; ClientSocket: TCustomIpClient); Var s: ansistring; Start clientSocket. Syndrome ('slim - v 0.0', # 10); SetLength (S, 6); ClientSketts Receavebook (S, 6); End; When I call ReceiveBuf (), the process ends, and fitness throws an exception: java.net.SocketException: connection Reset I have seen what sent and received. It shows that my code sends the protocol version, fitness sends back a message, and when I try to get this message
Read more

javascript - Classic ASP "ExecuteGlobal" statement acting differently on two servers -

-
I have a strange problem that I really do not know. In addition to developing a new ASP.NET site, I have to support the old "classic ASP" site. It is written in VBScript with a batch of JavaScript functions. Many of the JavaScript functions include 'files' Everything is fine on our production system (which security is controlled by another group - this is a military installation) Debugging them once did not work I). However, I have a fix for a vague bug that needs to be fully tested and some functions do not run under the "local" copy of the website that runs on my PC. For the record, I am running IIS 5.1 on XP. The problem is that some Javascript functions are running "OK" on the production server, but when they use it as a server, they are not defined on my PC what is happening that last Programmer, for some reason, has decided to put some functions in a series of files, which according to the observations, imitate the "need_once
Read more