jquery - javascript dom insertion. Performance vs Leak? -

-

I'm wondering what is the right way to put complex elements

So far, ( With jQuery) I used to first build my own element and to finish it once. I thought it was the most efficient, because Dome Access performance is fantastic.

But with the original JS, I have read that to avoid memory leaks, each new dome node should be inserted into the dome immediately after its creation.

Our intranet says:

Note the DOM Entry Order DOM Entry Order: No root element attached to the original element is attached to the DOM itself Please.

var root = document.createElement ("DIV"); Var children = document.createElement ("DIV"); // It is wrong root.appendChild (child); Document.body.appendChild (Route); // This is the right document. Don.appendChild (Route); Root.appendChild (child);

I found this page online that basically explain the same thing (under the cross-page leak section):

This means that Performance and leakage-prevention?

Should the new DOM elements be created and manipulated in the form of a string before being inserted? How are the JS libraries solving this? What is a miracle solution in the document?

Your quote is inspired by the article written by almost one member about the IE team, special Sections related to "DOM Insertion Order Leak Model" are eligible for a two-digit note:

  1. This article was written in 2005 specifically to address leaks issues in IE6 Had IE 7 been not released;
  2. This is only concerned with IE; There is no suggestion that any other browser is suffering from the same problem. According to the ("top management" under memory management improvements), IE 7 contains improvements to prevent such leaks for lifetime, in the browser window, and in IE 8 Hope has improved in the hope of ending the need to worry about the matter.

    The question you need to ask is: How important is IE6 for you? At the end of the day, DOM insertion order should never be anything to worry, but if (for example) you are working on an intranet app that will be used on IE6 for some time, then you Keep in mind the points in the 2005 article, if you have a luxury to know that IE6 is hardly a blip on your app's radar, do not worry about it.

    Oh, and note that adding everything to parents will provide better performance before adding parents to the page: if a new baby is added to each child Rather than replacing and replying, the browser can refill and repeat again when everything can come in a systematic part.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

asp.net - Javascript/DOM Why is does my form not support submit()? -

-
This is my first time working with asp.net and javascript, so I do not know very good web resources, or Much about javascript debugging I have to find out that on line oFormObject.submit (); Microsoft JScript Runtime Error: Object does not support this property or method I am using the link to work as a button because I am terrible in aesthetics and I think That link will look more professional than a table of 50 buttons. I have read that this solution can cause problems with browsers due to pre-rendering of my links and many additional traffic and problems, but CSS gives me a button like a link, which has issues of alignment and difference seemed to. & lt ;! DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "- // W3C // DTD HTML 4.01 // N" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd"> & Lt; Html xmlns = "http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" & gt; & Lt; Head & gt; & Lt; Link rel = "stylesheet" type = "text / css" href = "defect differen
Read more

sockets - Delphi: TTcpServer, connection reset when reading -

-
I am trying to implement one for Delphi, but there are some problems with communication. Fitnesse will start my process, and give me a portmember as a command line argument. Then I should make a socket on the port number given to me, and fitness will connect to that port I am using a TCPCP server for the job: < Pre> TcpServer1.LocalPort: = ParamStr (ParamCount); TcpServer1 Active: = true; On OnEXEPT () -Event, I send the protocol version to use as specified in the protocol. Process TForm1.TcpServer1Accept (From: TOBject; ClientSocket: TCustomIpClient); Var s: ansistring; Start clientSocket. Syndrome ('slim - v 0.0', # 10); SetLength (S, 6); ClientSketts Receavebook (S, 6); End; When I call ReceiveBuf (), the process ends, and fitness throws an exception: java.net.SocketException: connection Reset I have seen what sent and received. It shows that my code sends the protocol version, fitness sends back a message, and when I try to get this message
Read more

javascript - Classic ASP "ExecuteGlobal" statement acting differently on two servers -

-
I have a strange problem that I really do not know. In addition to developing a new ASP.NET site, I have to support the old "classic ASP" site. It is written in VBScript with a batch of JavaScript functions. Many of the JavaScript functions include 'files' Everything is fine on our production system (which security is controlled by another group - this is a military installation) Debugging them once did not work I). However, I have a fix for a vague bug that needs to be fully tested and some functions do not run under the "local" copy of the website that runs on my PC. For the record, I am running IIS 5.1 on XP. The problem is that some Javascript functions are running "OK" on the production server, but when they use it as a server, they are not defined on my PC what is happening that last Programmer, for some reason, has decided to put some functions in a series of files, which according to the observations, imitate the "need_once
Read more