webserver - Performance differences between Swazoo and Komanche? -


I want to know what is the difference between performance and performance between the Swazoo and the Comches for the seashore generally. Specifically why and in what situations should I like one over the other?

There are only major differences between the two:

  1. Swazoo is licensed under LGPL, while Comtech is licensed under the MIT license. Some people using LGGL software in Smalltalk are very uncomfortable, because after definition that some library in some smalltalk is very ambiguous. If you share this concern, then use comets.
  2. Comets only work in Skeak / Faroe and Gems, while Taste works in most Smalltalk. In particular, Swazhou GNU Smalltalk, Visual Works, Cheek / Faro, Gems and Dolphin. If you are working directly with the web server (which is very rare, to make it clear), you should probably develop against yourself. It should be a factor in very unusual applications.
  3. The coastal COMET packages only support Komanche. If you want komate and beach, you will need Komanche. Otherwise, two servers are roughly equal in terms of features and performance, and I honestly do not think it makes a big difference.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

asp.net - Javascript/DOM Why is does my form not support submit()? -

sockets - Delphi: TTcpServer, connection reset when reading -

javascript - Classic ASP "ExecuteGlobal" statement acting differently on two servers -