Omitting optional tags of html -


I just read from Google. I always thought that the closing tag is important to keep HTML tags clean and machine-readable . But they suggest contrast.

What do you think about it?

Google is in some unusual position to provide so many copies of their main search pages that the page Any small savings in size are added soon. This means that removing close pages and whitespace and reducing your pages is economical, at the cost of making it difficult to maintain them.

You are not Google; It is unlikely to pay the amount for you. You will notice on the Google page you linked that they do not miss the recommendation of the tag, because it is not one of the important pages Google offers. is. Compare the extreme mining of the front page of www.google.com.

Use Compression to Geese / Disfill and you will get a higher minimum transfer size than before; Reducing markup is a frustrating measure, unless you're not serving the load, there will be a premature optimization.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

asp.net - Javascript/DOM Why is does my form not support submit()? -

sockets - Delphi: TTcpServer, connection reset when reading -

javascript - Classic ASP "ExecuteGlobal" statement acting differently on two servers -