java - Cleaning up code breaks binary compatibility -

-

I am working on a project that I am not being used by many people. We've done a great job to bring down checkstall warnings and this is less because it is going to get binary compatibility without breaking it.

Most of the remaining warnings of constant (public static final) disappeared in the name of the final keyword constants, it becomes clear that the developer had intended to read them only, but they only got to the last Definition was not there.

Unless a developer was writing some pretty awesome code, inspect it, if we add them, their code will not be broken.

The current version number is 1.2.1. Do you apply changes and go to 2.0 or apply it and roll it as 1.3 seems like a very small change for a full 2.0 requirement.

What should I do?

I'm sure you already know this, but I suspect it is "this one Safe / simple / no-worry "upgrade?

  • Point releases are considered safe and routines should include full bug fixes in some projects. Other projects will include new features, if they are not likely to create problems .
  • New major version releases contain evolutionary changes that require optimization
  • The new flagship x.0 version release is highly suspected by sophisticated users It seems that: -)

I think it also depends on how close you are to the next major version release. If this is too soon, do not risk the problematic release of a problem. You can always release a safe point and release an alpha key, but it can be strange if the next big release is released in the future ...


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

asp.net - Javascript/DOM Why is does my form not support submit()? -

-
This is my first time working with asp.net and javascript, so I do not know very good web resources, or Much about javascript debugging I have to find out that on line oFormObject.submit (); Microsoft JScript Runtime Error: Object does not support this property or method I am using the link to work as a button because I am terrible in aesthetics and I think That link will look more professional than a table of 50 buttons. I have read that this solution can cause problems with browsers due to pre-rendering of my links and many additional traffic and problems, but CSS gives me a button like a link, which has issues of alignment and difference seemed to. & lt ;! DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "- // W3C // DTD HTML 4.01 // N" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd"> & Lt; Html xmlns = "http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" & gt; & Lt; Head & gt; & Lt; Link rel = "stylesheet" type = "text / css" href = "defect differen
Read more

sockets - Delphi: TTcpServer, connection reset when reading -

-
I am trying to implement one for Delphi, but there are some problems with communication. Fitnesse will start my process, and give me a portmember as a command line argument. Then I should make a socket on the port number given to me, and fitness will connect to that port I am using a TCPCP server for the job: < Pre> TcpServer1.LocalPort: = ParamStr (ParamCount); TcpServer1 Active: = true; On OnEXEPT () -Event, I send the protocol version to use as specified in the protocol. Process TForm1.TcpServer1Accept (From: TOBject; ClientSocket: TCustomIpClient); Var s: ansistring; Start clientSocket. Syndrome ('slim - v 0.0', # 10); SetLength (S, 6); ClientSketts Receavebook (S, 6); End; When I call ReceiveBuf (), the process ends, and fitness throws an exception: java.net.SocketException: connection Reset I have seen what sent and received. It shows that my code sends the protocol version, fitness sends back a message, and when I try to get this message
Read more

javascript - Classic ASP "ExecuteGlobal" statement acting differently on two servers -

-
I have a strange problem that I really do not know. In addition to developing a new ASP.NET site, I have to support the old "classic ASP" site. It is written in VBScript with a batch of JavaScript functions. Many of the JavaScript functions include 'files' Everything is fine on our production system (which security is controlled by another group - this is a military installation) Debugging them once did not work I). However, I have a fix for a vague bug that needs to be fully tested and some functions do not run under the "local" copy of the website that runs on my PC. For the record, I am running IIS 5.1 on XP. The problem is that some Javascript functions are running "OK" on the production server, but when they use it as a server, they are not defined on my PC what is happening that last Programmer, for some reason, has decided to put some functions in a series of files, which according to the observations, imitate the "need_once
Read more