Fastest/shortest way to build unique tree in Ruby? -


The fastest / least / one-liner (not possible: P) ways to make a unique tree tree Where many elements are repeated / missing in some nodes, there is a set of nodes in the tree (which we use this algorithm to find out that we do not have to manually do it).

This can be XML / JSON (hash), or anything like this:

root {nodes {node {} nodeb {all node { }}} Nodes {node a {subnode {}} nodeb {all nodex {}}}}

... it has been modified:

   root {nodes {node A {subnode {}} nodeb {all node {subNodeX}}}}   

< P> With XML:
   & lt; Root & gt; & Lt; Nodes & gt; & Lt; NodeA / & gt; & Lt; NodeB & gt; & Lt; SubNodeA / & gt; & Lt; / NodeB & gt; & Lt; / Nodes & gt; & Lt; Nodes & gt; & Lt; NodeA & gt; & Lt; SubNodeA / & gt; & Lt; / NodeA & gt; & Lt; NodeB & gt; & Lt; SubNodeX / & gt; & Lt; / NodeB & gt; & Lt; / Nodes & gt; & Lt; / Root & gt;   

   & lt; Root & gt; & Lt; Nodes & gt; & Lt; NodeA & gt; & Lt; SubNodeA / & gt; & Lt; / NodeA & gt; & Lt; NodeB & gt; & Lt; SubNodeA / & gt; & Lt; SubNodeX / & gt; & Lt; / NodeB & gt; & Lt; / Nodes & gt;     

The xml / json files may be well (1 MB +), so each element moves deeper It seems to be - before or something like it may take some time, it can also be small as an example above.

This requires a set of unique paths:

  '' Set 'xml = Nokogirl :: XML.parse (your_data) path = Set.new xml.traverse {| Node | Next if node.Text? Path & lt; & Lt; Node.path.gsub (/ \ [\ d + \] /, ""). Sub (/ \ / $ /, "")}  

Do you have to start this?

[Answer to question in comment]

Adding an attribute-path is also easy, but let's at least a bit-line:

  Xml .traverse do | Node | Next if node.Text? Path & lt; & Lt; (Npath = node.path.gsub (/ \ [\ d + \] /, ""). Sub (/ \ / $ /, "")) path + = node.dates.map {| K, v | "# {Npath} @ # {k}"} End  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

asp.net - Javascript/DOM Why is does my form not support submit()? -

sockets - Delphi: TTcpServer, connection reset when reading -

javascript - Classic ASP "ExecuteGlobal" statement acting differently on two servers -